Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How C C D P LLP stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 7 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortC C D P LLP(You)PA ConsultingJacobs UK LtdMott MadDonaldArcadis LLPMTC Operations Limited
iAuto-picked from 7 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | PC PA Consulting Peer · rank #1 | JU Jacobs UK Ltd Peer · rank #2 | MM Mott MadDonald Peer · rank #3 | AR Arcadis LLP Peer · rank #4 | CC C C D P LLP (You) · target supplier | MO MTC Operations Limited Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £100.1m | £47.9m | £6.8m | £6.6m | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | £264k | £47k | £53k | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £303.7m | £1.4bn | £25.8m | £469.0m | — | £3.3m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 11 | 79 | 19 | 15 | — | 1 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —