Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How M2M Technology stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortM2M Technology(You)Deloitte LLPSAP UK LtdPhoenix Software LimitedReveal Media LtdConcur Holdings (Netherlands) BV
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | DE Deloitte LLP Peer · rank #1 | SU SAP UK Ltd Peer · rank #2 | PS Phoenix Software Limited Peer · rank #3 | RM Reveal Media Ltd Peer · rank #4 | CH Concur Holdings (Netherlands) BV Peer · rank #5 | MT M2M Technology (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £419.3m | £293.6m | £289.9m | £7.8m | £538k | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £2.7m | — | £471k | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £2.8bn | £802.5m | £3.7bn | £43.0m | £14.8m | £46k(−100%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 95 | 17 | 226 | 6 | 2 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —