Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How MCKINSEY & COMPANY INC UNITED KINGDOM stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortMCKINSEY & COMPANY INC UNITED KINGDOM(You)CAPGEMINI UK PLCIBM United Kingdom LimitedAECOM LIMITEDQUANTEXA LIMITEDHippo Digital Limited
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | CU CAPGEMINI UK PLC Peer · rank #1 | IU IBM United Kingdom Limited Peer · rank #2 | AE AECOM LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | QU QUANTEXA LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | HD Hippo Digital Limited Peer · rank #5 | M& MCKINSEY & COMPANY INC UNITED KINGDOM (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £642.6m | £499.4m | £224.7m | £175.0m | £53.0m | £600k(−100%) |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £51.0m | £357.6m | £4.8m | — | £56.6m | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £4.2bn | £3.6bn | £828.0m | £186.4m | £404.1m | £119.3m(−86%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 39 | 36 | 136 | 1 | 13 | 1 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —