Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LIMITED stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortTATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LIMITED(You)CGI IT UK LIMITEDACCENTURE (UK) LIMITEDFRAZER-NASH CONSULTANCY LIMITEDRoute 101 LimitedFarsight Consulting Limited
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | CI CGI IT UK LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | A( ACCENTURE (UK) LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | TC TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LIMITED (You) · target supplier | FC FRAZER-NASH CONSULTANCY LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | R1 Route 101 Limited Peer · rank #5 | FC Farsight Consulting Limited Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £535.5m | £310.5m | £48.2m(−71%) | £22.9m | £1.7m | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £17.3m | £703k | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.9bn | £5.4bn | £2.4bn(+780%) | £247.2m | £268.5m | £89.8m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 32 | 25 | 10(−58%) | 23 | 2 | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —