Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How ARK Group DMCC stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortARK Group DMCC(You)CGI IT UK LIMITEDCACI LIMITEDFRAZER-NASH CONSULTANCY LIMITEDTransform UK (formerly Engine Partners)Investigo Limited
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | CI CGI IT UK LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | CA CACI LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | FC FRAZER-NASH CONSULTANCY LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | AG ARK Group DMCC (You) · target supplier | TU Transform UK (formerly Engine Partners) Peer · rank #5 | IN Investigo Limited Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £535.5m | £47.9m | £22.9m | £7.8m(−66%) | £4.8m | £3.5m |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £17.3m | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.9bn | £158.4m | £247.2m | £34.9m(−78%) | £4.8m | £131.9m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 32 | 32 | 23 | 3(−88%) | 1 | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —