Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How TLT N.I. LLP stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 10 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortTLT N.I. LLP(You)IRON MOUNTAIN (UK) PLCMILLS & REEVE LLPADDLESHAW GODDARD LLPDLA Piper UK LLPBevan Brittan LLP
iAuto-picked from 10 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | IM IRON MOUNTAIN (UK) PLC Peer · rank #1 | M& MILLS & REEVE LLP Peer · rank #2 | AG ADDLESHAW GODDARD LLP Peer · rank #3 | DP DLA Piper UK LLP Peer · rank #4 | BB Bevan Brittan LLP Peer · rank #5 | TN TLT N.I. LLP (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £20.1m | £10.3m | £10.1m | £6.1m | £3.7m | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £1.5m | £735k | — | £55k | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £574.3m | £178.9m | £118.9m | £108.6m | £212.3m | — |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 12 | 28 | 22 | 18 | 21 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —