Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Cogan Shackleton stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 5 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortCogan Shackleton(You)AECOM LIMITEDMace Consult LimitedQinetiQ LimitedMontagu Evans LLPStonbury Limited
iAuto-picked from 5 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | AE AECOM LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | MC Mace Consult Limited Peer · rank #2 | QI QinetiQ Limited Peer · rank #3 | ME Montagu Evans LLP Peer · rank #4 | ST Stonbury Limited Peer · rank #5 | CS Cogan Shackleton (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £219.5m | £70.7m | £38.4m | £4.0m | £2.9m | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £4.8m | £2.6m | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £827.8m | £738.3m | £3.2bn | £46.6m | £29.8m | — |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 132 | 15 | 6 | 20 | 21 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —