Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How MCADAM DESIGN LIMITED stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortMCADAM DESIGN LIMITED(You)AECOM LIMITEDMOTT MACDONALD LIMITEDJacobs UK LtdCURRIE & BROWN UK LIMITEDPRP
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | AE AECOM LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | MM MOTT MACDONALD LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | JU Jacobs UK Ltd Peer · rank #3 | C& CURRIE & BROWN UK LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | MD MCADAM DESIGN LIMITED (You) · target supplier | PR PRP Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £224.7m | £61.7m | £48.0m | £7.1m | £1.2m(−97%) | £762k |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £4.8m | £22k | £264k | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £828.0m | £1.5bn | £1.4bn | £94.6m | £1.6m(−100%) | £101.6m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 136 | 77 | 80 | 16 | 2(−97%) | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —