Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Burrell Foley Fischer Ridyard LLP stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortBurrell Foley Fischer Ridyard LLP(You)MOTT MACDONALD LIMITEDGLEEDS COST MANAGEMENT LIMITEDAtkinsRéalis PPS LimitedRobertson Construction Group LtdHighpoint Developments Ltd
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | MM MOTT MACDONALD LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | GC GLEEDS COST MANAGEMENT LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | AP AtkinsRéalis PPS Limited Peer · rank #3 | RC Robertson Construction Group Ltd Peer · rank #4 | BF Burrell Foley Fischer Ridyard LLP (You) · target supplier | HD Highpoint Developments Ltd Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £61.7m | £35.0m | £28.4m | £8.1m | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £22k | £50.2m | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.5bn | £335.2m | £39.1m | £2.5bn | £1.4m(−100%) | £7.9m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 77 | 23 | 8 | 6 | — | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —