Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Eversheds Sutherland (International) LLP stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months. Target HQ: London.
Value band:
/
CohortEversheds Sutherland (International) LLP(You)PA CONSULTING SERVICES LIMITEDDeloitte LLPMethods business and digital technology limitedWAVEMAKER LIMITEDVEALE WASBROUGH VIZARDS LLP
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | PC PA CONSULTING SERVICES LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | DE Deloitte LLP Peer · rank #2 | MB Methods business and digital technology limited Peer · rank #3 | ES Eversheds Sutherland (International) LLP (You) · target supplier | WA WAVEMAKER LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | VW VEALE WASBROUGH VIZARDS LLP Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £334.4m | £158.5m | £55.4m | £21.5m(−61%) | £2.0m | £36k |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £14.7m | £5.5m | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.8bn | £1.9bn | £421.6m | £154.5m(−63%) | £175.7m | £14.2m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 59 | 93 | 43 | 22(−49%) | 10 | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —