Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Forvis Mazars stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 19 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months. Target HQ: London.
Value band:
/
CohortForvis Mazars(You)Methods business and digital technology limitedSopra Steria LimitedMatrix SCM LimitedConexia LimitedSHARED SERVICES CONNECTED LTD (SSCL)
iAuto-picked from 19 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | MB Methods business and digital technology limited Peer · rank #1 | SS Sopra Steria Limited Peer · rank #2 | MS Matrix SCM Limited Peer · rank #3 | FM Forvis Mazars (You) · target supplier | CO Conexia Limited Peer · rank #5 | SS SHARED SERVICES CONNECTED LTD (SSCL) Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £55.4m | £30.4m | £20.0m | £3.1m(−88%) | £616k | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | £125k | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £421.6m | £1.2bn | £1.7bn | £8.4m(−98%) | £286.3m | £159.0m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 43 | 10 | 12 | 16(+45%) | ||
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —