Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How MGAC LLP stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months. Target HQ: London.
Value band:
/
CohortMGAC LLP(You)AECOM LIMITEDPURCELL ARCHITECTURE LIMITEDJohn Sisk and Son LtdDREES & SOMMER UK LIMITEDM GROUP HIGHWAYS LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | AE AECOM LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | PA PURCELL ARCHITECTURE LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | JS John Sisk and Son Ltd Peer · rank #3 | D& DREES & SOMMER UK LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | MG MGAC LLP (You) · target supplier | MG M GROUP HIGHWAYS LIMITED Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £223.9m | £25.0m | £4.6m | £737k | £390k(−97%) | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £5.5m | — | — | — | — | £121.8m |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £841.2m | £35.3m | £271.7m | £37.5m | £60.5m(−50%) | £121.8m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 143 | 10 | 1 | 13 | 2(−80%) | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —