Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How CMS CAMERON MCKENNA NABARRO OLSWANG LLP stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months. Target HQ: London.
Value band:
/
CohortCMS CAMERON MCKENNA NABARRO OLSWANG LLP(You)Deloitte LLPERNST & YOUNG LLPMILLS & REEVE LLPHogan LovellsVeale Wasbrough Visards LLP
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | DE Deloitte LLP Peer · rank #1 | E& ERNST & YOUNG LLP Peer · rank #2 | M& MILLS & REEVE LLP Peer · rank #3 | HL Hogan Lovells Peer · rank #4 | VW Veale Wasbrough Visards LLP Peer · rank #5 | CC CMS CAMERON MCKENNA NABARRO OLSWANG LLP (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £420.8m | £99.3m | £12.1m | £3.4m | £286k | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £2.7m | £963k | £685k | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £2.4bn | £1.8bn | £190.9m | £5.2m | £16.6m | £15.7m(−92%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 92 | 56 | 31 | 5 | 7 | 2(−94%) |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —