Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How WATSON FARLEY & WILLIAMS LLP stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months. Target HQ: London.
Value band:
/
CohortWATSON FARLEY & WILLIAMS LLP(You)Eversheds Sutherland (International) LLPMILLS & REEVE LLPCapsticks Solicitors LLPBevan Brittan LLPWard Hadaway LLP
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | ES Eversheds Sutherland (International) LLP Peer · rank #1 | M& MILLS & REEVE LLP Peer · rank #2 | CS Capsticks Solicitors LLP Peer · rank #3 | BB Bevan Brittan LLP Peer · rank #4 | WH Ward Hadaway LLP Peer · rank #5 | WF WATSON FARLEY & WILLIAMS LLP (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £18.0m | £11.7m | £4.9m | £4.4m | £778k | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £310k | £685k | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £158.7m | £190.9m | £244.4m | £212.7m | £60.5m | £1.0m(−99%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 28 | 30 | 15 | 22 | 10 | 1(−95%) |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —