Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Hill Dickinson LLP stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 16 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months. Target HQ: North West.
Value band:
/
CohortHill Dickinson LLP(You)KPMG LLPMOTTRAM ASSOCIATES LIMITEDMILLS & REEVE LLPHogan LovellsShakespeare Martineau LLP
iAuto-picked from 16 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | KP KPMG LLP Peer · rank #1 | MA MOTTRAM ASSOCIATES LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | M& MILLS & REEVE LLP Peer · rank #3 | HL Hogan Lovells Peer · rank #4 | HD Hill Dickinson LLP (You) · target supplier | SM Shakespeare Martineau LLP Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £314.8m | £58.9m | £12.1m | £3.4m | £3.3m(−72%) | £1.6m |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £40.1m | £22k | £685k | — | — | £1.8m |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £4.7bn | £1.5bn | £190.9m | £5.2m | £148.6m(−22%) | £29.9m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 93 | 81 | 31 | 5 | 8(−74%) | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —