Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Womble Bond Dickinson (UK) LLP stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months. Target HQ: London.
Value band:
/
CohortWomble Bond Dickinson (UK) LLP(You)KPMG LLPAECOM LIMITEDPricewaterhouseCoopers LLPEversheds Sutherland (International) LLPUCL Consultants Ltd
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | KP KPMG LLP Peer · rank #1 | AE AECOM LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | PR PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Peer · rank #3 | ES Eversheds Sutherland (International) LLP Peer · rank #4 | UC UCL Consultants Ltd Peer · rank #5 | WB Womble Bond Dickinson (UK) LLP (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £324.0m | £224.7m | £52.1m | £21.5m | £7.1m | £2.6m(−95%) |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £44.5m | £4.8m | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £4.7bn | £828.0m | £266.2m | £154.5m | £49.5m | £79.0m(−70%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 97 | 136 | 2 | 22 | 9 | 12 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —