Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Hazle McCormack Young LLP stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 4 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months. Target HQ: South East.
Value band:
/
CohortHazle McCormack Young LLP(You)MOTTRAM ASSOCIATES LIMITEDPURCELL ARCHITECTURE LIMITEDAHR Building Consultancy LtdPellings LLPPRP
iAuto-picked from 4 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | MA MOTTRAM ASSOCIATES LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | PA PURCELL ARCHITECTURE LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | AB AHR Building Consultancy Ltd Peer · rank #3 | PE Pellings LLP Peer · rank #4 | PR PRP Peer · rank #5 | HM Hazle McCormack Young LLP (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £58.7m | £25.0m | £4.0m | £1.5m | £218k | £35k(−99%) |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £22k | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.2bn | £35.3m | £37.0m | £148.3m | £101.6m | £758k(−99%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 79 | 10 | 10 | 4 | 1 | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —