Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Macfarlanes LLP stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 4 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortMacfarlanes LLP(You)KPMG LLPMace Consult LimitedGRANT THORNTON UK ADVISORY and TAX LLPMace LimitedSSCL
iAuto-picked from 4 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | KP KPMG LLP Peer · rank #1 | MC Mace Consult Limited Peer · rank #2 | GT GRANT THORNTON UK ADVISORY and TAX LLP Peer · rank #3 | MA Mace Limited Peer · rank #4 | MA Macfarlanes LLP (You) · target supplier | SS SSCL Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £324.0m | £70.7m | £8.2m | £762k | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £44.5m | £2.6m | £4.5m | £53k | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £4.7bn | £738.3m | £235.1m | £5.2bn | £3.2m(−100%) | £159.4m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 97 | 15 | 25 | 9 | — | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —