Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How WALKER MORRIS LLP stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 8 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months. Target HQ: Yorkshire.
Value band:
/
CohortWALKER MORRIS LLP(You)Mace Consult LimitedJacobs UK LtdADDLESHAW GODDARD LLPDLA PIPER EUROPE LLPAshurst
iAuto-picked from 8 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | MC Mace Consult Limited Peer · rank #1 | JU Jacobs UK Ltd Peer · rank #2 | AG ADDLESHAW GODDARD LLP Peer · rank #3 | DP DLA PIPER EUROPE LLP Peer · rank #4 | AS Ashurst Peer · rank #5 | WM WALKER MORRIS LLP (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £71.3m | £47.4m | £7.6m | £7.6m | £7.4m | £44k(−99%) |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | £264k | — | £55k | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £738.8m | £1.4bn | £119.8m | £173.4m | £222.9m | £13.8m(−94%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 19 | 79 | 22 | 22 | 35 | 2 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —