Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Swinburne Maddison LLP stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 2 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortSwinburne Maddison LLP(You)AshurstFREUD COMMUNICATIONS LIMITEDLogiq Consulting LimitedMATRIX SCM LIMITED (02227962)GI Recruitment Limited
iAuto-picked from 2 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | AS Ashurst Peer · rank #1 | FC FREUD COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | LC Logiq Consulting Limited Peer · rank #3 | MS MATRIX SCM LIMITED (02227962) Peer · rank #4 | SM Swinburne Maddison LLP (You) · target supplier | GR GI Recruitment Limited Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £7.4m | £6.0m | £4.9m | £4.5m | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | £125k | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £222.9m | £25.5m | £42.0m | £1.7bn | £2.0m(−99%) | £298.7m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 35 | 3 | 7 | 11 | — | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —