Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Fenland Fire Appliance stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 2 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortFenland Fire Appliance(You)HARMONY FIRE LIMITEDEFT SYSTEMS LIMITEDF. PARKINSON LIMITEDFiremark LtdUmlaut Engineering GMBH
iAuto-picked from 2 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | HF HARMONY FIRE LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | ES EFT SYSTEMS LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | FP F. PARKINSON LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | FI Firemark Ltd Peer · rank #4 | FF Fenland Fire Appliance (You) · target supplier | UE Umlaut Engineering GMBH Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £7.9m | £2.8m | £1.2m | £42k | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £409.3m | £98.9m | £437.8m | £15.7m | £36k(−100%) | £1.4m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 11 | 3 | 8 | 1 | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —