Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How OSBORNE CLARKE LLP stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 10 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortOSBORNE CLARKE LLP(You)Matrix SCM LimitedHogan Lovells International LLPConexia LimitedHeywood LtdXEWLI LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 10 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | MS Matrix SCM Limited Peer · rank #1 | HL Hogan Lovells International LLP Peer · rank #2 | OC OSBORNE CLARKE LLP (You) · target supplier | CO Conexia Limited Peer · rank #4 | HE Heywood Ltd Peer · rank #5 | XE XEWLI LIMITED Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £20.0m | £13.9m | £1.3m(−83%) | £616k | £99k | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £125k | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.7bn | £89.0m | £18.6m(−79%) | £286.3m | £29.2m | £19.9m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 12 | 12 | 6(−25%) | 4 | 3 | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —