Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How OSBORNE CLARKE LLP stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 10 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortOSBORNE CLARKE LLP(You)DLA PIPER EUROPE LLPMATRIX SCM LIMITED (02227962)Hogan LovellsHeywood LtdXEWLI LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 10 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | DP DLA PIPER EUROPE LLP Peer · rank #1 | MS MATRIX SCM LIMITED (02227962) Peer · rank #2 | HL Hogan Lovells Peer · rank #3 | OC OSBORNE CLARKE LLP (You) · target supplier | HE Heywood Ltd Peer · rank #5 | XE XEWLI LIMITED Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £7.6m | £4.1m | £3.4m | £1.3m(−66%) | £99k | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £55k | £125k | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £173.4m | £1.7bn | £5.2m | £18.6m(−36%) | £29.2m | £19.9m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 22 | 9 | 5 | 6(−14%) | 3 | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —