Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How WARD WILLIAMS ASSOCIATES LLP stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months. Target HQ: South West.
Value band:
/
CohortWARD WILLIAMS ASSOCIATES LLP(You)Methods business and digital technology limitedJacobs UK LtdConstellia Public LimitedCURRIE & BROWN UK LIMITEDArcadis LLP
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | MB Methods business and digital technology limited Peer · rank #1 | JU Jacobs UK Ltd Peer · rank #2 | CP Constellia Public Limited Peer · rank #3 | C& CURRIE & BROWN UK LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | AR Arcadis LLP Peer · rank #5 | WW WARD WILLIAMS ASSOCIATES LLP (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £55.4m | £48.0m | £37.5m | £7.1m | £6.6m | £347k(−99%) |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | £264k | £275k | — | £53k | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £421.6m | £1.4bn | £600.3m | £94.6m | £469.0m | £13.5m(−97%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 43 | 80 | 135 | 16 | 15 | 6 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —