Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How PHILIP PANK PARTNERSHIP LLP stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months. Target HQ: London.
Value band:
/
CohortPHILIP PANK PARTNERSHIP LLP(You)AECOM LIMITEDCURRIE & BROWN UK LIMITEDJohn Sisk and Son LtdDREES & SOMMER UK LIMITEDM GROUP HIGHWAYS LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | AE AECOM LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | C& CURRIE & BROWN UK LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | JS John Sisk and Son Ltd Peer · rank #3 | D& DREES & SOMMER UK LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | PP PHILIP PANK PARTNERSHIP LLP (You) · target supplier | MG M GROUP HIGHWAYS LIMITED Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £223.9m | £7.5m | £4.6m | £737k | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £5.5m | — | — | — | — | £121.8m |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £841.2m | £97.3m | £271.7m | £37.5m | £54.1m(−56%) | £121.8m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 143 | 16 | 1 | 13 | 1(−92%) | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —