Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Ward and Burke Construction Ltd stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortWard and Burke Construction Ltd(You)Anglian Water Business (National) Limited T/A WaveScottish Water Business StreamANGLIAN WATER BUSINESS (NATIONAL) LIMITEDMITIE WASTE & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES LIMITEDWave Utilities Limited
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | AW Anglian Water Business (National) Limited T/A Wave Peer · rank #1 | SW Scottish Water Business Stream Peer · rank #2 | AW ANGLIAN WATER BUSINESS (NATIONAL) LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | MW MITIE WASTE & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | WU Wave Utilities Limited Peer · rank #5 | WA Ward and Burke Construction Ltd (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £38.9m | £16.1m | £3.0m | £2.0m | £426k | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | £121.0m | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £120.9m | £249.7m | £2.5bn | £187.3m | £230.7m | — |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 4 | 19 | 3 | 4 | 1 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —