Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortUNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM(You)CAPGEMINI UK PLCCGI IT UK LIMITEDInfluential Software ServicesIFF ResearchAmbition Institute
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | CU CAPGEMINI UK PLC Peer · rank #1 | CI CGI IT UK LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | IS Influential Software Services Peer · rank #3 | IR IFF Research Peer · rank #4 | AI Ambition Institute Peer · rank #5 | UO UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £772.3m | £528.7m | £30.1m | £10.4m | £9.7m | £5.8m(−81%) |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £51.7m | £703k | — | — | — | £245k(−99%) |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £4.5bn | £2.2bn | £33.3m | £10.4m | £31.3m | £153.1m(+359%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 46 | 33 | 3 | 2 | 4 | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —