Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Queen Mary University of London stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortQueen Mary University of London(You)KPMG LLPHippo Digital LimitedIpsos (Market Research) LtdGartner UK LimitedPRIVATE PUBLIC LTD
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | KP KPMG LLP Peer · rank #1 | HD Hippo Digital Limited Peer · rank #2 | I( Ipsos (Market Research) Ltd Peer · rank #3 | GU Gartner UK Limited Peer · rank #4 | PP PRIVATE PUBLIC LTD Peer · rank #5 | QM Queen Mary University of London (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £323.1m | £28.4m | £20.9m | £15.2m | £3.8m | £717k(−97%) |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £44.5m | £40.4m | £600k | £124k | £2.4m | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £4.7bn | £410.6m | £102.8m | £80.0m | £25.1m | £345.3m(+236%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 97 | 13 | 40 | 68 | 8 | 4 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —