Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How J. & H.M. DICKSON LIMITED stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 11 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months. Target HQ: Scotland.
Value band:
/
CohortJ. & H.M. DICKSON LIMITED(You)Interclass plcPilon LimitedCHAS BERGER LIMITEDTHE AD CONSTRUCTION GROUP LIMITEDMulalley and Company Ltd
iAuto-picked from 11 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | IN Interclass plc Peer · rank #1 | PI Pilon Limited Peer · rank #2 | CB CHAS BERGER LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | TA THE AD CONSTRUCTION GROUP LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | J& J. & H.M. DICKSON LIMITED (You) · target supplier | MA Mulalley and Company Ltd Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £10.8m | £6.7m | £350k | £79k | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £225.2m | £280.3m | £88.3m | £76.6m | — | £254.0m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 5 | 4 | 2 | 1 | — | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —