Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Mackay & Inglis stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 18 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortMackay & Inglis(You)Banner Group LtdIRON MOUNTAIN (UK) PLCHH Associates Ltd (trading as HH Global)Allied Publicity Services (Manchester) LtdAPS GROUP GLOBAL LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 18 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | BG Banner Group Ltd Peer · rank #1 | IM IRON MOUNTAIN (UK) PLC Peer · rank #2 | HA HH Associates Ltd (trading as HH Global) Peer · rank #3 | AP Allied Publicity Services (Manchester) Ltd Peer · rank #4 | M& Mackay & Inglis (You) · target supplier | AG APS GROUP GLOBAL LIMITED Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £25.9m | £20.1m | £13.5m | £4.1m | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | £1.5m | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £640.6m | £574.3m | £204.8m | £455.9m | — | £56.2m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 47 | 12 | 2 | 11 | — | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —