Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How AES Limited stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 7 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortAES Limited(You)Stone Technologies Ltd t/a Converge Technology SolutionsMatthews and TannertCHAR.GY LIMITEDPopay Procurement LtdAmeresco Limited
iAuto-picked from 7 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | ST Stone Technologies Ltd t/a Converge Technology Solutions Peer · rank #1 | MA Matthews and Tannert Peer · rank #2 | AE AES Limited (You) · target supplier | CH CHAR.GY LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | PP Popay Procurement Ltd Peer · rank #5 | AM Ameresco Limited Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £3.8m | £1.2m | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | £631k | — | £7.0m | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £14.0m | £207.7m | £50k(−100%) | £27.2m | £6.5m | £2.1bn |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 14 | 7 | — | 8 | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —