Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Watson and Lyall Limited stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 16 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortWatson and Lyall Limited(You)Matthews and TannertCHAS BERGER LIMITEDELM SITE SERVICES LIMITEDAmeresco LimitedACG Building Services Ltd
iAuto-picked from 16 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | MA Matthews and Tannert Peer · rank #1 | CB CHAS BERGER LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | WA Watson and Lyall Limited (You) · target supplier | ES ELM SITE SERVICES LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | AM Ameresco Limited Peer · rank #5 | AB ACG Building Services Ltd Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £7.1m | £350k | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £631k | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £207.7m | £88.3m | — | £9.1m | £2.1bn | £2.0m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 10 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —