Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Ironside Farrar stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortIronside Farrar(You)PA CONSULTING SERVICES LIMITEDTurner & Townsend Project Management LtdArcadis LLPMontagu Evans LLPSSCL
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | PC PA CONSULTING SERVICES LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | T& Turner & Townsend Project Management Ltd Peer · rank #2 | AR Arcadis LLP Peer · rank #3 | ME Montagu Evans LLP Peer · rank #4 | IF Ironside Farrar (You) · target supplier | SS SSCL Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £332.4m | £42.0m | £6.6m | £4.0m | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £14.7m | — | £53k | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.8bn | £521.8m | £469.0m | £46.6m | — | £159.4m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 56 | 22 | 15 | 20 | — | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —