Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How ARPL Architects stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 12 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortARPL Architects(You)MOTTRAM ASSOCIATES LIMITEDALLIANCE LEISURE SERVICES LIMITEDJohn Sisk and Son LtdPellings LLPPRP
iAuto-picked from 12 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | MA MOTTRAM ASSOCIATES LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | AL ALLIANCE LEISURE SERVICES LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | JS John Sisk and Son Ltd Peer · rank #3 | PE Pellings LLP Peer · rank #4 | PR PRP Peer · rank #5 | AA ARPL Architects (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £58.9m | £14.5m | £4.6m | £1.5m | £762k | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £22k | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.5bn | £90.9m | £271.7m | £148.3m | £101.6m | — |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 81 | 11 | 1 | 5 | 2 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —