Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Targeting Innovation Limited stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 11 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortTargeting Innovation Limited(You)Matrix SCM LimitedNCC Group Security Services LimitedSSCLSUSTENIC LIMITEDSeiche Ltd
iAuto-picked from 11 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | MS Matrix SCM Limited Peer · rank #1 | NG NCC Group Security Services Limited Peer · rank #2 | TI Targeting Innovation Limited (You) · target supplier | SS SSCL Peer · rank #4 | SU SUSTENIC LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | SE Seiche Ltd Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £19.5m | £8.8m | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £125k | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.7bn | £79.4m | — | £159.4m | £2.7m | £1.8m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 10 | 19 | — | — | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —