Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Clyde Valley Lifts Limited stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortClyde Valley Lifts Limited(You)Watling JCB LimitedDirect Healthcare Group LtdRJ Lifts GroupFerno (UK) LimitedAprolis UK Ltd (trading as Impact Handling)
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | WJ Watling JCB Limited Peer · rank #1 | DH Direct Healthcare Group Ltd Peer · rank #2 | RL RJ Lifts Group Peer · rank #3 | F( Ferno (UK) Limited Peer · rank #4 | AU Aprolis UK Ltd (trading as Impact Handling) Peer · rank #5 | CV Clyde Valley Lifts Limited (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £2.1m | £1.5m | £1.0m | £883k | £390k | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £19.0m | £24.6m | £7.9m | £9.5m | £1.4m | £40k(−100%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 4 | 6 | 12 | 5 | 3 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —