Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Protec Facilities Management Ltd stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 5 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months. Target HQ: Scotland.
Value band:
/
CohortProtec Facilities Management Ltd(You)KGB CLEANING SOUTH WEST LIMITEDCHURCHILL CONTRACT SERVICES LIMITEDKindredORIAN SOLUTIONS LIMITEDVigilant Protect UK Limited
iAuto-picked from 5 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | KC KGB CLEANING SOUTH WEST LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | CC CHURCHILL CONTRACT SERVICES LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | KI Kindred Peer · rank #3 | OS ORIAN SOLUTIONS LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | PF Protec Facilities Management Ltd (You) · target supplier | VP Vigilant Protect UK Limited Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £12.8m | £12.3m | £4.9m | £4.2m | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | £6.3m | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £51.5m | £254.8m | £46.4m | £37.9m | — | £3.6m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 9 | 16 | 4 | 5 | — | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —