Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How 442 Design Ltd stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 2 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
Cohort442 Design Ltd(You)Morgan Sindall Construction & Infrastructure LtdCostain LtdHOCHTIEF UKAECOM LIMITEDMace Consult Limited
iAuto-picked from 2 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | MS Morgan Sindall Construction & Infrastructure Ltd Peer · rank #1 | CO Costain Ltd Peer · rank #2 | HU HOCHTIEF UK Peer · rank #3 | AE AECOM LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | MC Mace Consult Limited Peer · rank #5 | 4D 442 Design Ltd (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £1.2bn | £1.1bn | £981.7m | £224.7m | £70.7m | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | £71.8m | — | £4.8m | £2.6m | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £11.7bn | £3.9bn | £981.7m | £827.8m | £738.3m | — |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 19 | 16 | 1 | 136 | 15 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —