Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Dynam stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 2 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortDynam(You)Ernst and Young LLPManning Gottlieb OMDTMP Worldwide (UK) LTDCRUNCH DMC LIMITEDInternational Management Group (UK) LTD
iAuto-picked from 2 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | EA Ernst and Young LLP Peer · rank #1 | MG Manning Gottlieb OMD Peer · rank #2 | TW TMP Worldwide (UK) LTD Peer · rank #3 | DY Dynam (You) · target supplier | CD CRUNCH DMC LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | IM International Management Group (UK) LTD Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £42.7m | £25.4m | £250k | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £110.5m | £585.9m | £335.5m | — | £8.0m | £4.7m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 6 | 4 | 1 | — | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —