Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Care Visions stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 7 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortCare Visions(You)Mercury Training LtdARCH Teesside C.I.O.Camarinal HoldingsAddiction Recovery AgencyLeeds Trinity University
iAuto-picked from 7 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | MT Mercury Training Ltd Peer · rank #1 | AT ARCH Teesside C.I.O. Peer · rank #2 | CV Care Visions (You) · target supplier | CH Camarinal Holdings Peer · rank #4 | AR Addiction Recovery Agency Peer · rank #5 | LT Leeds Trinity University Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £900k | £496k | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £900k | £496k | £13k(−100%) | £7.3m | £10.5m | £107.9m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 1 | 1 | — | — | 2 | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —