Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Rubicer Scotland Limited stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortRubicer Scotland Limited(You)Matthews and Tannertidverde LimitedGlendale Countryside Ltdidverde UK LimitedMcFour Limited
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | MA Matthews and Tannert Peer · rank #1 | ID idverde Limited Peer · rank #2 | GC Glendale Countryside Ltd Peer · rank #3 | RS Rubicer Scotland Limited (You) · target supplier | IU idverde UK Limited Peer · rank #5 | MC McFour Limited Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £6.7m | £1.0m | £641k | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £631k | £32.5m | £174k | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £207.7m | £494.4m | £180.4m | — | £14.5m | £1.3m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 9 | 14 | 16 | — | — | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —