Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How 1932 Taxi ltd stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 5 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
Cohort1932 Taxi ltd(You)Arriva London NorthMetrolineLondon UnitedArriva London SouthViaVan Technologies B.V.
iAuto-picked from 5 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | AL Arriva London North Peer · rank #1 | 1T 1932 Taxi ltd (You) · target supplier | ME Metroline Peer · rank #3 | LU London United Peer · rank #4 | AL Arriva London South Peer · rank #5 | VT ViaVan Technologies B.V. Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £434k | — | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £401.6m | — | £181.7m | £156.7m | £228.6m | £5.5m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 1 | — | — | — | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —