Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How MDG Chameleon Ltd stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortMDG Chameleon Ltd(You)ATKINS LIMITEDBJSS LimitedCITY PLUMBING SUPPLIES HOLDINGS LIMITEDInenco Groupbradford energy Limited
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | AT ATKINS LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | BJ BJSS Limited Peer · rank #2 | CP CITY PLUMBING SUPPLIES HOLDINGS LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | MC MDG Chameleon Ltd (You) · target supplier | IG Inenco Group Peer · rank #5 | BE bradford energy Limited Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £9.9m | £5.0m | £841k | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.2bn | £1.0bn | £132.3m | — | £504.2m | £73.1m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 3 | 1 | 6 | — | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —