Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Ivanhoe Forth Limited stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortIvanhoe Forth Limited(You)Kier ConstructionBowmer + Kirkland LimitedBAM Construction LtdTilbury DouglasIan Williams
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | KC Kier Construction Peer · rank #1 | B+ Bowmer + Kirkland Limited Peer · rank #2 | BC BAM Construction Ltd Peer · rank #3 | TD Tilbury Douglas Peer · rank #4 | IW Ian Williams Peer · rank #5 | IF Ivanhoe Forth Limited (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £4.3bn | £818.5m | £415.5m | £354.3m | £235.4m | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | £231k | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £12.4bn | £2.7bn | £2.6bn | £770.9m | £1.0bn | — |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 37 | 38 | 18 | 30 | 23 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —