Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Constant Security stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortConstant Security(You)Mitie Security LimitedMitie FM LimitedQinetiQ LimitedSIEMENS PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANYIRVINGQ Ltd
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | MS Mitie Security Limited Peer · rank #1 | MF Mitie FM Limited Peer · rank #2 | QI QinetiQ Limited Peer · rank #3 | SP SIEMENS PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY Peer · rank #4 | CS Constant Security (You) · target supplier | IR IRVINGQ Ltd Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £334.1m | £288.3m | £38.4m | £39k | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | £100k | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.1bn | £4.1bn | £3.2bn | £93.5m | £125k(−100%) | £58.7m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 4 | 5 | 6 | 4 | — | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —