Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How ZAM Facilities Management stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortZAM Facilities Management(You)G4S Secure Solutions (UK) LimitedThales DIS UK LtdLivity Life LimitedVigilant Protect UK LimitedVIDECOM SECURITY LTD.
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | GS G4S Secure Solutions (UK) Limited Peer · rank #1 | ZF ZAM Facilities Management (You) · target supplier | TD Thales DIS UK Ltd Peer · rank #3 | LL Livity Life Limited Peer · rank #4 | VP Vigilant Protect UK Limited Peer · rank #5 | VS VIDECOM SECURITY LTD. Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £48.7m | — | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £757.5m | — | £316.2m | £7.7m | £3.6m | £8.5m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 4 | — | — | 1 | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —