Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Harper Macleod LLP stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortHarper Macleod LLP(You)PA CONSULTING SERVICES LIMITEDDeloitte LLPMethods business and digital technology limitedVEALE WASBROUGH VIZARDS LLPSHARED SERVICES CONNECTED LTD (SSCL)
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | PC PA CONSULTING SERVICES LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | DE Deloitte LLP Peer · rank #2 | MB Methods business and digital technology limited Peer · rank #3 | HM Harper Macleod LLP (You) · target supplier | VW VEALE WASBROUGH VIZARDS LLP Peer · rank #5 | SS SHARED SERVICES CONNECTED LTD (SSCL) Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £334.4m | £158.5m | £55.4m | £1.8m(−98%) | £36k | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £14.7m | £5.5m | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.8bn | £1.9bn | £421.6m | £3.0m(−99%) | £14.2m | £159.0m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 59 | 93 | 43 | 1(−98%) | 6 | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —