Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Ledingham Chalmers stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 2 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortLedingham Chalmers(You)Dentons UK & Middle East LLPAshurstTLT LLPBurges Salmon LLPThurrock Council
iAuto-picked from 2 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | DU Dentons UK & Middle East LLP Peer · rank #1 | AS Ashurst Peer · rank #2 | TL TLT LLP Peer · rank #3 | BS Burges Salmon LLP Peer · rank #4 | LC Ledingham Chalmers (You) · target supplier | TC Thurrock Council Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £10.7m | £6.0m | £5.2m | £3.6m | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £104.4m | £221.4m | £181.3m | £206.2m | — | £10.2m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 13 | 35 | 26 | 23 | — | 1 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —