Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How TC Young LLP stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortTC Young LLP(You)MILLS & REEVE LLPBevan Brittan LLPWard Hadaway LLPWeightman's LLPKEOGHS LLP
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | M& MILLS & REEVE LLP Peer · rank #1 | BB Bevan Brittan LLP Peer · rank #2 | WH Ward Hadaway LLP Peer · rank #3 | WE Weightman's LLP Peer · rank #4 | TY TC Young LLP (You) · target supplier | KE KEOGHS LLP Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £12.1m | £4.0m | £778k | £426k | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £685k | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £190.9m | £212.4m | £60.5m | £176.3m | £16k(−100%) | £82.0m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 31 | 21 | 10 | 8 | — | 1 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —