Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Nema Hart stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 2 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortNema Hart(You)CAPGEMINI UK PLCIBM United Kingdom LimitedERNST & YOUNG LLPBoxxe Limitedlabman automation
iAuto-picked from 2 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | CU CAPGEMINI UK PLC Peer · rank #1 | IU IBM United Kingdom Limited Peer · rank #2 | E& ERNST & YOUNG LLP Peer · rank #3 | BO Boxxe Limited Peer · rank #4 | LA labman automation Peer · rank #5 | NH Nema Hart (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £772.8m | £469.1m | £108.1m | £53.5m | £50k | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £62.3m | £350.5m | £5.4m | £96k | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £4.5bn | £3.6bn | £1.8bn | £1.2bn | £5.8m | £34k(−100%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 49 | 33 | 61 | 79 | 1 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —