Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How R G Pools stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 2 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortR G Pools(You)Schofield and Sons LtdPool Tech ServicesMainmark Ground Engineering (UK) LtdTotal Pool LtdArcus Products Limited
iAuto-picked from 2 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | SA Schofield and Sons Ltd Peer · rank #1 | PT Pool Tech Services Peer · rank #2 | RG R G Pools (You) · target supplier | MG Mainmark Ground Engineering (UK) Ltd Peer · rank #4 | TP Total Pool Ltd Peer · rank #5 | AP Arcus Products Limited Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £583k | £14k | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £4.6m | £217k | £130k(−40%) | £270k | £183k | £148k |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 4 | 2 | — | — | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —